| Monash home | About Monash | Faculties | Campuses | Contact Monash |
| Staff directory | A-Z index | Site map |
Candidature Progress Management - Confirmation & Non-Confirmation ProceduresParent PolicyCandidature Progress Management Policy These procedures describe steps involved in confirming candidature for Doctoral and Masters of Philosophy candidates (hereafter referred to as 'candidates') following a period of probationary candidature; and action to be taken following identification of and provision of assistance to those candidates who are at risk of not making satisfactory progress in a probationary research program. Where intervention proves unsuccessful, a decision of non confirmation of candidature will be made. Separate procedures exist for candidates enrolled in faculty Masters by Research programs.The relevant Dean (or nominee) is to support a decision for non confirmation of candidature only where due process for confirmation of candidature has been followed within the academic unit and faculty, as specified by the Research Graduate School Committee and outlined in these procedures. 1. Probationary candidatureResearch candidates who are admitted to probationary candidature are required to satisfy the requirements for confirmation of candidature to continue in the degree.1.1 Length of probationary candidature1.1.1 Doctoral CandidatesExcept where the Committee in any particular case otherwise determines the first 12 months full-time (or equivalent) of a doctoral program is a period of probationary candidature. For doctoral candidates enrolled in the Doctor of Psychology (Clinical and Neuropsychology) and the Doctorate of Juridical Science the first 18 months full-time (or equivalent) is a period of probationary candidature.A minimum period of nine months of full-time probationary doctoral candidature (or equivalent) should normally be completed before confirmation of candidature is granted. In exceptional circumstances, earlier confirmation of candidature may be considered after six months of full-time (or equivalent) candidature. A strong supporting case is required from the relevant faculty and approval will be granted by the Research Graduate School Committee on a case-by-case basis. 1.1.2 Master of Philosophy CandidatesExcept where Research Graduate School Committee in any particular case otherwise determines, the first six months full-time (or equivalent) of a research masters program is a period of probationary candidature.For MPhil candidates who are undertaking a coursework component, the first nine months full-time (or equivalent) is a period of probationary candidature. Confirmation of MPhil candidature can be deferred until 12 months of full-time candidature (or equivalent) where an upgrade to doctoral candidature is anticipated. ResponsibilityMonash Research Graduate School (MRGS) 1.2 Initial noticeAt least ten weeks prior to the due date for confirmation of candidature, the candidate, supervisor and academic unit should be advised in writing of the candidate’s requirement to confirm candidature. This written notification will:
A candidate’s supervisor or the Graduate Coordinator of the relevant academic unit may request a pre-confirmation extension to the candidate’s probationary period of up to 10 weeks, where delays beyond the candidate’s control have occurred in the research project and it is not possible for the candidate to confirm candidature in the given timeframe. In exceptional circumstances an extension beyond the 10-week period may be approved. All requests for a pre-confirmation extension should be submitted to the Monash Research Graduate School prior to the due date of confirmation. ResponsibilityMonash Research Graduate School (MRGS) 1.3 Evidence of satisfactory progressAs a minimum requirement to establish satisfactory progress and confirm candidature, a higher degree research candidate must meet the following requirements. Faculties may have additional requirements that must be met before candidature can be confirmed.1.3.1 Oral presentationAn oral presentation of at least 20 minutes on the research project should be given at either a departmental seminar and/or viva voce. Members of the Confirmation Review Panel (hereafter referred to as the 'Review Panel', see Section 1.4) must be in attendance for the oral presentation. The oral presentation should explore the research undertaken to date and the anticipated future directions of the research program. There should be an opportunity for members of the audience and the Review Panel to ask questions and provide feedback.1.3.2 Written submissionA research proposal, progress report and publication list (if applicable) should be submitted by the candidate. A suggested format for the report is as follows:
Candidates should discuss the academic unit and faculty requirements for confirmation with their supervisor and/or Graduate Co-ordinator before commencing the written report. 1.3.3 Other course requirementsWhere the degree regulations specify a coursework, practical or performance component, candidates may be required to satisfactorily complete some or all of these components prior to confirmation of candidature.ResponsibilityCandidates 1.4 Role and composition of the Confirmation Review PanelWhen a candidate is required to confirm candidature, the Graduate Coordinator in the relevant academic unit must constitute a Review Panel to:
The Review Panel should include:
The Chair of the Review Panel must be independent of the candidate’s work and cannot be or have been the candidate's supervisor. Where the Graduate Coordinator or Head of the Academic Unit is the candidate’s supervisor, another academic staff member within the Academic Unit must be nominated to convene and chair the Review Panel. Where more than one supervisor is present on the Review Panel, the second supervisor cannot replace the third panel member, who must be independent from the candidate's research. In these circumstances, a fourth panel member is required. The recommendation to confirm candidature will be based on the decision of the majority of the Panel. Where a majority cannot be reached, the final decision should rest with the Chair. Where the recommendation is not unanimous, this should be detailed in the Review Panel report. ResponsibilityGraduate Coordinator 1.5 The Initial Confirmation Review Panel ReportThe Chair of the Review Panel will prepare a comprehensive report from the Review Panel which will include:
ResponsibilityReview Panel Chair 1.6 Outcome of the candidate’s first presentation for confirmation of candidatureThe Review Panel Report, once signed by the student, must be submitted to the Graduate Coordinator or the Head of the Academic Unit for endorsement.The Graduate Coordinator (or Head of Academic Unit), on the recommendation of the Review Panel, will make one of the following determinations:
Where candidature is not confirmed, a candidate will be given an opportunity to revise his/her research project and/or presentation in order to meet the requirements for confirmation during a specified extension to probationary candidature. ResponsibilityGraduate Coordinator/Head of Academic Unit 1.7 Post-confirmation extension to the period of probationary candidatureWhere candidature cannot be confirmed at this time, an extension may be granted. The duration of the extension period will be at least 12 weeks, but may be longer where the Review Panel determines that additional time is required to achieve the targets established for the candidate. Candidates may also elect to choose a shorter extension period where appropriate.The Graduate Coordinator or Head of Academic Unit, (with authority delegated from the Research Graduate School Committee under Section 3.1 and 9.5 of the Candidature Progress Management Regulations) will notify the candidate in writing of the following with a copy to the Research Graduate School and the Faculty:
ResponsibilityGraduate Coordinator/Head of Academic Unit 1.8 Second confirmation submissionWhen the specified extension to probationary candidature has passed, the candidate will be given a further opportunity to satisfy the requirements for confirmation of candidature. This will normally involve another oral presentation, submission of a revised written submission and meeting again with the Review Panel. In some cases the Confirmation Review Panel may determine that only a revised written submission is required, or, if another oral presentation is required, that it may be limited to the original panel.The Chair of the Review Panel will prepare a comprehensive report from the Review Panel which will include:
Where the Dean (or nominee), on the recommendation of the Review Panel:
ResponsibilityChair of Review Panel 1.9 Written notice of non confirmation of candidatureFollowing a decision not to confirm candidature and within 10 working days of receiving advice from the Academic Unit, the Dean (or nominee) should notify the candidate in writing of:
ResponsibilityThe Dean or nominee 1.10 Candidate's status following a notice of non confirmation of candidatureFollowing a written notice of non confirmation of candidature, the candidate’s enrolment will be maintained until either:
If the candidate does not lodge an appeal in the specified timeframe, the Research Graduate School Committee will proceed with the Dean (or nominee’s) decision not to confirm candidature and exclude the candidate from the degree. ResponsibilityMonash Research Graduate School 2. Appeals of decisions not to confirm candidature2.1 Candidate's notice of appeal against the decision not to confirm candidatureIf the candidate wishes to appeal the decision not to confirm candidature, he/she is required to lodge an appeal with the Chair of the Research Graduate School Committee, by written notice directed to the General Manager of the Monash Research Graduate School (or nominee) within 20 working days of service of the above notice (Section 1.9). This written notification should address the following:
Following receipt of a candidate's appeal, the Chair of the Research Graduate School Committee may determine that the appeal is frivolous, vexatious, misconceived or lacking in substance and on that basis decide that the appeal should not be heard. In such cases, the General Manager of the Monash Research Graduate School (or nominee), acting on behalf of the Chair of the Research Graduate School Committee, should advise the candidate in writing by email of this decision and the reason/s for it within 20 working days of the receipt of the candidate's appeal. The email is to inform the candidate of their opportunity to request internal review of the decision by the University Student Ombudsman and external review of the decision by the Victorian Ombudsman. ResponsibilityCandidate 2.2 Constitution of a Confirmation Appeal PanelWhere the Chair of the Research Graduate School Committee does not dismiss the appeal as frivolous, vexatious, misconceived or lacking in substance, the Chair (or nominee) should constitute a Confirmation Appeal Panel (hereafter referred to as the 'Appeal Panel'), within 20 working days of the receipt of the candidate's appeal, to consider the matter. Membership must include:
In particular the following persons cannot be members of an Appeal Panel. A person who:
The Appeal Panel has the authority to take written submissions or hear from any persons it deems appropriate. As standard practice, the Appeal Panel will provide an opportunity for the candidate and representatives from the academic unit and/or faculty to be heard when considering an appeal against non confirmation of candidature. The Chair of the Appeal Panel, after taking into consideration the candidate’s preference, shall determine whether the hearing will be in person or based on written submissions. Where the Chair of the Appeal Panel determines that the hearing will be based on written submissions, representatives of the academic unit will only appear before the Appeal Panel if the Appeal Panel calls them. The candidate’s enrolment is to continue until the final determination on the appeal is reached by the Appeal Panel. The candidate will not be provided with learning opportunities and must not pursue his/her research during this period. ResponsibilityChair, Research Graduate School Committee (or nominee) 2.3 Notice of membership of the Confirmation Appeal Panel2.3.1 Notice to candidateFollowing the constitution of the Appeal Panel and within 20 working days of receipt of the candidate’s notice of appeal, the General Manager of the Monash Research Graduate School (or nominee) should write to the candidate on behalf of the Appeal Panel Chair, to inform him/her of the following:
ResponsibilityGeneral Manager of the Monash Research Graduate School (or nominee) 2.3.2 Notice to academic unit and/or facultyAt the same time as the above notice (Section 2.3.1) is sent to the candidate, written notice of the following should be given to the staff in the academic unit and/or faculty who were directly involved in the recommendation not to confirm candidature:
ResponsibilityGeneral Manager, Monash Research Graduate School (or nominee) 2.3.3 Objection by candidates to the notice of membership of the Confirmation Appeal PanelWithin 10 working days of receipt of the above notice (Section 2.3.1), the candidate is to advise the Chair of the Appeal Panel, by written notice directed to the General Manager of the Monash Research Graduate School (or nominee), whether he/she wishes to object to a proposed member of the Appeal Panel. Such notice should include full particulars of the reasonable apprehension of bias.The General Manager of the Monash Research Graduate School (or nominee) will acknowledge receipt of the objection on behalf of the Chair of the Appeal Panel and advise the candidate how the Chair of the Appeal Panel intends to proceed on the matter. On receipt of an objection to a panel member, the Chair of the Appeal Panel will:
The General Manager of the Monash Research Graduate School (or nominee) will write to the candidate on behalf of the Chair of the Appeal Panel, to advise the outcome of his/her objection. ResponsibilityGeneral Manager of the Monash Research Graduate School (or nominee) 2.3.4 Candidate’s written submissionAt least five working days prior to the hearing date, the candidate is required to lodge all written submissions and substantiating documents with the Chair of the Appeal Panel by written notice directed to the General Manager of the Monash Research Graduate School (or nominee).The General Manager of the Monash Research Graduate School (or nominee) should acknowledge receipt of the above item/s on behalf of the Chair of the Appeal Panel, by email. ResponsibilityCandidate 2.3.5 Academic unit and/or faculty response to the notice of membership of the Confirmation Appeal PanelAt least five working days prior to the established hearing date, the academic unit and/or faculty is to:
ResponsibilityRelevant staff in the academic unit 2.4 Notice of final Panel membership and scheduled hearingAs soon as possible after receipt of the candidate’s response under Section 2.3.4 and the response of the academic unit and/or faculty under Section 2.3.5, and at least three working days prior to the hearing date, the General Manager of the Monash Research Graduate School (or nominee) on behalf of the Chair of the Appeal Panel should provide the panel members, the candidate and the academic unit and/or faculty representative/s with:
ResponsibilityGeneral Manager, Monash Research Graduate School (or nominee) 2.5 Confirmation Appeal Panel hearingThe Appeal Panel will meet to consider the candidate’s appeal against non confirmation of candidature and the academic unit and/or faculty’s case in relation to this. The candidate, academic unit and/or faculty representative/s and any other parties invited by the Chair of the Appeal Panel to present information will be given an opportunity to do so.The General Manager of the Monash Research Graduate School (or nominee) is to provide the Chair of the Appeal Panel with guidelines to assist in the coordination of proceedings and to help ensure procedural fairness. ResponsibilityChair, Confirmation Appeal Panel 2.6 Final determination of the Confirmation Appeal PanelThe Appeal Panel is to make a final determination on a candidate’s appeal against non confirmation of candidature based on the information and evidence presented.The Appeal Panel may:
Should the appeal be upheld, and a candidate is granted a further period of probationary candidature, the relevant academic department and faculty will make suitable arrangements to support the candidate through the additional period of probationary candidature. At the end of any further period of probationary candidature granted, the Appeal Panel, following advice from the Confirmation Review Panel, will make a final decision as to whether candidature will be confirmed. ResponsibilityConfirmation Appeal Panel members and Chair 2.6.1 Where the Confirmation Appeal Panel upholds the candidate’s appealIf the Appeal Panel upholds the candidate’s appeal against the non confirmation of candidature, the candidate will be permitted to remain in candidature and resume his/her research. Time elapsed during the process of the Appeal will be added to the length of candidature.The Appeal Panel may determine certain conditions which must be met by the candidate and/or academic unit and/or faculty. Where candidature is to continue, the academic unit and/or faculty is expected to make suitable arrangements to support the candidate going forward, either as a confirmed candidate or as a probationary candidate for a further specified period. The Dean of the relevant faculty (or nominee) will advise the proposed arrangements to support the candidate, including:
The Appeal Panel, following advice from the Confirmation Review Panel, will make a final determination on the matter. ResponsibilityConfirmation Appeal Panel 2.6.2 Where the Confirmation Appeal Panel upholds the decision not to confirm candidatureIf the Appeal Panel has determined to uphold the Faculty’s decision not to confirm candidature, or following a further period of probationary candidature detailed in Section 2.6.1 has determined not to confirm candidature, the candidate is to be notified in writing of the exclusion from candidature and the reasons for it. The candidate is also to be advised of his/her right to request internal review of the decision by the University Student Ombudsman and external review by the Victorian Ombudsman.Where the candidate is excluded from the degree, the candidate will normally not be readmitted to candidature within four years of the exclusion date. The Research Graduate School Committee will only approve re-admission following this period where suitable facilities and effective supervision are available to support the candidate and where the Committee is satisfied that the candidate is now in a position to undertake research towards a successful thesis completion. Where health issues have impacted on the candidate’s original enrolment, this may take the form of certification from a medical practitioner. ResponsibilityGeneral Manager, MRGS or nominee 2.7 Notice of Confirmation of Appeal Panel’s final determinationThe Appeal Panel’s final determination together with the reasons for it is to be reported, in confidence, to the Research Graduate School Committee.The General Manager of the Monash Research Graduate School (or nominee) on behalf of the Chair of the Appeal Panel is to advise the following of the Appeal Panel’s final determination on the matter and reasons for it:
ResponsibilityChair, Confirmation Appeal Panel 2.8 Order of hearings in relation to Higher Degree by Research candidatureCandidature matters are normally heard by the Research Graduate School Committee in the order in which they are received.Non confirmation of candidature procedures are considered to commence from the written notice of non confirmation of candidature, as detailed in Section 1.8. Should a candidate lodge:
ResponsibilityChair, Research Graduate School Committee (or nominee) Content Enquiries: Policy Mrgs University Policy Use Only:
|